In the ongoing trial of Michael Lynn, where he faces allegations of stealing £27 million from financial institutions, including Bank of Ireland and Ulster Bank, bank workers have stepped forward to defend themselves against claims of negligence. Former Bank of Ireland senior business manager Jim Madden and Ulster Bank’s John Morgan have vehemently denied any wrongdoing, testifying that they were unaware of Lynn’s multiple mortgages and denying arranging meetings or informing him about forbearance.
As the trial continues, the bank workers are determined to prove their innocence.
Allegations and Offences
Accusations and charges have been brought against Michael Lynn for allegedly stealing £27 million from seven financial institutions.
Lynn, who has pleaded not guilty to 21 counts of theft, is facing allegations that he obtained multiple mortgages on the same properties without the knowledge of the banks involved.
The financial institutions affected by Lynn’s alleged actions include Bank of Ireland, National Irish Bank/Danske Bank, Irish Life and Permanent, Ulster Bank, ACC Bank, Bank of Scotland Ireland, and Irish Nationwide Building Society.
Testimonies from former bank employees have provided insight into the case, with Jim Madden, a former senior business manager at Bank of Ireland, confirming that the loan was approved without knowledge of other loans from Ulster Bank.
Both Madden and Ulster Bank representative John Morgan have denied claims of negligence in their lending to Lynn.
Bank Testimonials
Two bank workers involved in the Michael Lynn trial have given evidence and refuted accusations of negligence.
Jim Madden, a former senior business manager at Bank of Ireland, testified regarding Lynn’s mortgage application. He confirmed that the bank approved the loan without knowledge of any other loans from Ulster Bank.
John Morgan, representing Ulster Bank, also denied any negligence in lending to Lynn and cooperated with the police. Both bank workers rejected claims of negligence and denied organizing meetings or informing Lynn about leniency. The defense counsel’s argument of negligence was also dismissed by both witnesses.
The evidence revealed that Ulster Bank had a system in place to monitor the registration of security on properties, while Irish Nationwide Building Society found irregularities in loans to Lynn.
The trial is ongoing before Judge Nolan and a jury, with no specific details about the charges against Lynn being provided.
Negligence Claims
Denying any claims of negligence, both bank workers involved in the Michael Lynn trial testified about their actions in relation to Lynn’s mortgage application. Jim Madden, former senior business manager at Bank of Ireland, stated that the bank had approved the loan without knowledge of other loans from Ulster Bank. He denied arranging a meeting with Lynn and informing him about forbearance. John Morgan from Ulster Bank confirmed their cooperation with the police and rejected allegations of negligence in lending to Lynn. Defence counsel’s contention of negligence was also rejected by both witnesses. To provide a clearer overview of the testimonies, a table is presented below:
| Bank Worker | Actions Taken |
|---|---|
| Jim Madden | Approved loan without knowledge of other loans from Ulster Bank. Denied arranging a meeting with Lynn and informing him about forbearance. |
| John Morgan | Cooperated with the police. Denied allegations of negligence in lending to Lynn. Rejected defence counsel’s contention of negligence. |
Security and Loan Irregularities
The discovery of security and loan irregularities has emerged as a significant aspect in the ongoing trial of Michael Lynn, as revealed in the Bank Workers Deny Negligence in Michael Lynn Trial. These irregularities have raised questions about the banks’ processes and their handling of loans to Mr. Lynn. Here are three key points regarding the security and loan irregularities:
-
Ulster Bank had a process to track security registration on properties, which suggests that they had measures in place to ensure the validity of the loans. However, it remains to be seen how effective this process was in detecting any irregularities.
-
Irish Nationwide Building Society (INBS) discovered irregularities in their loans to Mr. Lynn. This raises concerns about the thoroughness of their due diligence process and whether they properly assessed the risks associated with lending to him.
-
The discovery of an invalid letter of undertaking from Fiona McAleenan Solicitors further highlights potential irregularities in the loan transactions. This raises questions about the authenticity of the documentation provided and the banks’ verification processes.
These security and loan irregularities will likely play a crucial role in determining Mr. Lynn’s guilt or innocence in the trial.
Trial Proceedings and Bank Workers’ Defence
During the ongoing trial before Judge Nolan and a jury, bank workers involved in the case strongly deny allegations of negligence. Testimonies from former Bank of Ireland senior business manager, Jim Madden, and Ulster Bank’s John Morgan were given to refute the claims.
Madden testified that Bank of Ireland approved the loan without knowledge of other loans from Ulster Bank, denying any negligence on their part. Similarly, Morgan confirmed Ulster Bank’s cooperation with the police and denied any negligence in lending to Michael Lynn.
Both witnesses rejected the defence counsel’s contention of negligence and denied arranging meetings or providing information about forbearance to Lynn. While no specific arguments were provided by the bank workers, their strong denial aimed to counter the negligence claims made against them during the trial.
Summary
In the ongoing trial of Michael Lynn, bank workers have strongly denied any negligence in their handling of his mortgage applications. Testimonies from former Bank of Ireland senior business manager Jim Madden and Ulster Bank’s John Morgan have contradicted claims of arranging meetings or informing Lynn about forbearance.
As the trial continues, the bank workers remain resolute in proving their innocence and dismissing any suggestions of wrongdoing. The outcome of the trial will determine the fate of Lynn and the credibility of the bank workers.
